**

The seismic shifts in global politics following Donald Trump's presidency continue to reverberate. While Trump himself may be absent from the daily headlines, his impact, both positive and negative, is undeniably felt across the world stage. The political career of Boris Johnson, the former UK Prime Minister, offers a fascinating case study in understanding the lasting consequences of the "Trump effect" and what we can expect from similar populist leaders in the years to come. Analyzing Johnson's rise and fall provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of a Trumpian political style and the potential pitfalls awaiting those who emulate his tactics.

The Trumpian Playbook: Populism and its Perils

Boris Johnson's ascent to power shared striking similarities with Donald Trump's. Both leveraged a potent blend of populism, nationalism, and anti-establishment rhetoric to connect with a disillusioned electorate. Key elements of their strategies included:

• Direct Communication: Both Trump and Johnson bypassed traditional media outlets, utilizing social media and rallies to speak directly to their base. This circumvented critical scrutiny and allowed for the dissemination of their message without journalistic filter.
• Anti-Establishment Sentiment: Both leaders successfully tapped into widespread public frustration with established political institutions and elites, positioning themselves as outsiders challenging the status quo. This resonated deeply with voters feeling ignored and underserved by traditional politicians.
• Nationalistic Appeals: Both employed strong nationalistic narratives, emphasizing national pride and sovereignty. This played well with voters who felt their national identity was under threat or undervalued.
• Simple, Memorable Slogans: From Trump's "Make America Great Again" to Johnson's "Get Brexit Done," both leaders mastered the art of crafting concise, memorable slogans that resonated with their target audiences.

Johnson's Rise and Fall: A Post-Trump Case Study

Johnson's success in mimicking certain aspects of the Trump playbook is undeniable. His electoral victory in 2019 was largely attributed to his effective use of populist messaging and his promise to "Get Brexit Done," mirroring Trump's focus on specific, resonant promises. However, his downfall highlights some critical flaws in this approach.

• Lack of Substantive Policy: While both Trump and Johnson successfully mobilized their bases with emotionally charged rhetoric, neither was particularly known for detailed or coherent policy proposals. This often led to inconsistencies and ultimately failed to deliver on the high expectations set.
• Erosion of Trust: Both leaders faced consistent accusations of dishonesty and a lack of transparency, leading to significant erosion of public trust. This eventually proved to be a major factor in their respective declines.
• Emphasis on Personality over Policy: The focus on personality-driven politics, while initially successful, ultimately proved unsustainable. When confronted with serious challenges, neither leader's personal charisma could adequately compensate for a lack of credible policy solutions.
• The limits of populist appeal: Johnson's Brexit strategy, while initially popular, eventually fractured the country and caused significant internal strife. This demonstrates that populist appeals, though effective in the short term, may not be sustainable in the long run.

What to Expect in the Post-Trump Era: Lessons from Johnson

Johnson's experience offers several key insights into the potential future of populist leaders following Trump's model:

The Short-Term Appeal, Long-Term Pitfalls

Populism can be a powerful tool for gaining electoral success, but it is not a guarantee of long-term stability. Johnson's downfall demonstrates the inherent risks of prioritizing short-term gains over substantive policy and enduring governance. The focus on spectacle and personality, while initially captivating, can ultimately prove to be detrimental.

The Importance of Accountability

The failure of both Trump and Johnson to prioritize transparency and accountability ultimately contributed to their decline. In the current media landscape, attempts to circumvent scrutiny are increasingly difficult, and the consequences of misleading the public can be severe.

The Enduring Power of Substance

While populism can provide a powerful initial spark, ultimately successful governance requires a foundation of well-defined policies and credible solutions to real-world problems. Leaders who neglect this fundamental aspect of leadership are unlikely to achieve lasting success.

The Rise of Anti-Populism?

The backlash against Trump and Johnson's brand of populism suggests a potential shift in the political landscape. Voters may become increasingly wary of simplistic solutions and emotionally charged rhetoric, demanding instead more nuanced approaches and a greater emphasis on factual accuracy and accountability.

Conclusion: Beyond the Trumpian Model

The post-Trump era will inevitably see leaders attempting to emulate his successes, but Johnson's case study serves as a crucial reminder of the limitations of a purely populist approach. While the tactics of direct communication, nationalist appeals, and anti-establishment rhetoric can be effective, they must be complemented by credible policy, transparency, and a commitment to long-term governance. The future of politics may well hinge on how successfully leaders navigate the complex balance between populist appeal and effective, responsible leadership. The legacies of both Trump and Johnson will continue to be debated and analyzed for years to come, shaping the political landscape and informing the strategies of future leaders. The question remains: will future aspirants learn from both their successes and their ultimate failures?